Prince Andrew could face an unprecedented level of disgrace if Mark Harrison’s compromising photos of him with Jeffrey on Epstein’s island are made public.

The Duke of York’s career-ending interview was the subject of a Netflix film titled ‘Scoop’ that was released earlier this year

Prince Andrew is poised to face new embarrassment as the National Portrait Gallery considers an offer to display a photograph featuring the Duke of York with Emily Maitlis, taken after his infamous BBC Newsnight interview.

Following the interview’s broadcast in November 2019, which led to his stepping back from royal duties, Prince Andrew gave Emily Maitlis a tour of Buckingham Palace. 

At the time, he was unaware of the intense backlash his responses would provoke, reported GB News.

During the tour, photographer Mark Harrison captured images of Andrew and Maitlis walking through the palace. Harrison has since offered one of these photographs to the National Portrait Gallery as a gift. 

A spokesperson for the gallery confirmed that the photograph is currently under review.

They said: “The photograph has been offered to the Gallery as a gift by the photographer and the offer is being considered via our standard acquisitions process.”

A final decision will not be made until the gallery appoints a new chief curator. The gallery may also acquire the photograph and choose not to display it.

However, if the photograph is displayed the Duke of York’s humiliation would be preserved in the historic gallery.

Earlier this year, Harrison opened up on his experience of watching the interview live as it was filmed.

He said: “When the thing got going, my eyeline just remained fixed on the cameraman.

“I was standing just behind one of the cameramen, and I could see the other one on the other side, and I was just fixed on catching his eye, and eyebrows went up and hands went across mouths.”

Harrison said regarding taking the photographs after the interview: “All my photographs taken after the interview there are no smiles. There’s nothing. It’s all tense from her (Emily Maitlis).”

He added regarding Prince Andrew’s reaction after the interview: “At that moment, I thought, ‘I can’t believe you thought this went well because the rest of us are all catching eyes’, and I’m told to just get out and get it to press.”

Photographer Mark Harrison’s offer to the National Portrait Gallery of a photograph featuring Prince Andrew and Emily Maitlis has sparked new discussions surrounding the Duke of York’s career-ending interview. The image, taken after Prince Andrew’s infamous BBC Newsnight interview, captures a moment of tension between the Duke and Maitlis as they walk through Buckingham Palace. The gallery is currently reviewing the offer, with a decision pending until a new chief curator is appointed.Harrison, reflecting on the experience of witnessing the interview live, described the palpable unease in the room. Observing the reactions of the cameramen as the interview unfolded, he noted the lack of smiles and the overall tension in the air. Despite Prince Andrew’s obliviousness to the fallout that would follow his responses, Harrison’s photographs serve as a stark reminder of the discomfort and embarrassment that transpired that day.If the National Portrait Gallery chooses to display the photograph, it would immortalize Prince Andrew’s moment of humiliation within the walls of a historic institution. The image, devoid of smiles and filled with tension, would serve as a lasting testament to the Duke’s ill-fated interview that led to his withdrawal from royal duties.Looking back on the events that unfolded that day, Harrison recalled the disbelief he felt as he watched Prince Andrew’s reactions to the interview. The lack of awareness on the Duke’s part, contrasted with the reactions of those present, painted a vivid picture of the aftermath of his ill-received statements.As the National Portrait Gallery deliberates on the offer, the potential display of this photograph adds another layer to the narrative surrounding Prince Andrew’s interview. Capturing a moment frozen in time, the image stands as a symbol of the repercussions of ill-considered actions and statements, reminding viewers of the enduring impact of one fateful interview.

Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you.
Source: Los Angeles Times (edited)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!