Journalist Who Spoke with Prince Andrew Gives New Perspective—Does the Royal Truly Deserve His Tarnished Image?

The former Newsnight journalist who once sat down with Prince Andrew revealed her thoughts on the infamous 2019 interview that led to the disgraced royal stepping down from full-time duties.

Emily Maitlis recalled Andrew thinking it was “preposterous” that sexual assault allegations from his close friendship with pedophile Jeffrey Epstein “followed him for a decade” as she opened up on whether or not she thought he was guilty, RadarOnline.com can reveal.

Maitlis reflected on her 2019 sit down with the disgraced royal in an interview with actress Ruth Wilson, who is set to play her in an upcoming three-part drama about the interview.

Writing in The Times, Maitlis recalled Wilson asking her “simply, bluntly” if she thought Andrew was guilty of sexually assaulting Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre.

The former Newsnight presenter wrote: “I tell her there is no way I or anyone else will ever know the full truth of what happened with or to Virginia Giuffre.”

While Maitlis diplomatically declined to brand Andrew guilty of assaulting Giuffre, she claimed “he was clearly guilty of other things”, such as “his continued friendship with Epstein after his arrest” and “his flat-footed response to the victims of sex trafficking”.

She further noted Andrew said he was “too honorable” to cut ties with Epstein without traveling to Manhattan to stay in his townhouse for four days.

Andrew also referred to Epstein’s “behavior” as “unbecoming” rather than outright denouncing his actions as a sex offender.

She added: “This is not proof of Andrew’s own criminal behavior, I explain, but it does tell us a story of power and unchecked privilege.

“It tells the story of a man who finds it preposterous these allegations have followed him around for nearly a decade. And perhaps it tells a story of what happens when our royals have no right of reply.”

Maitlis also revealed how Newsnight deputy editor Stewart Maclean initially turned down the opportunity to interview Andrew in May 2019 because the royal demanded no questions about Epstein be asked.

After Maclean turned down the interview “precisely because he didn’t like the idea of there being red-line questions that were out of bounds”, Maitlis said Andrew opted to “slip away to an ITV interview instead”.

Of course, the Newsnight interview eventually took place – and Maitlis grilled him. She pressed him on accusations the Epstein victim was trafficked to have sex with him when she was just 17 years old.

Giuffre alleged in one detailed encounter with the Duke of York he sweated heavily while they danced at a London nightclub. Andrew shot down the allegation, claiming he couldn’t perspire heavily due to a medical condition from serving in the Falklands War.

It was one of many blunders Andrew made during the interview.

Though he denied the accusations and claimed he had no recollection of ever meeting Giuffre, Andrew stepped down from his role as a full-time working royal after the interview aired in November 2019.

The aftermath of Prince Andrew’s controversial interview with Emily Maitlis continues to stir up conversations and debates surrounding his ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Despite his adamant denial of any wrongdoing, many are still left questioning the disgraced royal’s involvement with the convicted sex offender.Maitlis, in her candid recount of the interview, highlighted Andrew’s questionable responses and lack of accountability for his association with Epstein. His refusal to acknowledge the severity of the allegations against him and his dismissal of the victims’ stories only added fuel to the fire of public scrutiny.The three-part drama featuring Ruth Wilson as Maitlis sheds light on the intricacies of the interview and the unanswered questions that continue to linger. Was Andrew truly unaware of Epstein’s crimes, or did he turn a blind eye to protect his own interests?The refusal to address the red flags surrounding Epstein’s behavior and his own complicity in maintaining a friendship with the disgraced financier speak volumes about the culture of privilege and entitlement that permeates certain circles of society. The royal family’s failure to hold Andrew accountable reflects a larger issue of unchecked power and the repercussions of turning a blind eye to injustice.As the saga unfolds, it serves as a stark reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and empathy in the face of allegations as serious as those leveled against Prince Andrew. The truth may never fully come to light, but the public’s demand for justice and integrity remains unwavering.

Follow us to see more useful information, as well as to give us more motivation to update more useful information for you.
Source: Los Angeles Times (edited)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

error: Content is protected !!